Cross-examining a
psych doctor is typically no simple task.
You definitely don’t want to add unnecessary challenges to the
cross-examination process. Therefore,
during cross-examination it is imperative that you confirm that the doctor is
using the same copy of the report that he/she submitted to the court. If even one word is different it could mean
that a sentence or a whole section might have an entirely different meaning
than what was originally produced by the doctor. Further, allowing the doctor to use a
different copy of their report will cause significant confusion during the
cross-examination process and result in a delay in the proceedings. Thus, if it is discovered that the doctor is
operating from a different copy of their report than what was originally
submitted to the court, despite however minor the differences are portrayed,
you should immediately halt the cross-examination and insist that the doctor
use the official version of his/her report to testify. Otherwise you are comparing apples and
oranges.
No comments:
Post a Comment