In all medical-legal psych cases after all the adversarial
posturing is done one can only hope that some semblance of the truth was
revealed. Regardless of which side of these litigations you take,
there are things you can do to enhance your position. Specifically,
whether the evaluating or treating doctor has diagnosed a disorder you
don’t believe is present, or whether they failed to diagnose a condition
you believe the patient has, you can take effective action. Over time I
have provided readers of my newsletters with various tips on how to
cross-examine psych doctors. This newsletter reviews some of those
tips.
Read More: http://drleckartwetc.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/August-2016-Newsletter-as-of-081516.pdf
Check out my blog (http://drleckart.blogspot.com). More help can be found at my website (www.drleckartwetc.com) and in my book Psychological Evaluations In Litigation: A Practical Guide for Attorneys and Insurance Adjusters
Read More: http://drleckartwetc.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/August-2016-Newsletter-as-of-081516.pdf
Check out my blog (http://drleckart.blogspot.com). More help can be found at my website (www.drleckartwetc.com) and in my book Psychological Evaluations In Litigation: A Practical Guide for Attorneys and Insurance Adjusters
No comments:
Post a Comment