The Somatoform Disorders are
characterized by the presence of physical signs and/or symptoms that suggest
that the individual has a general medical condition accounting for the signs
and/or symptoms but those signs and/or symptoms cannot be fully explained by a
general medical condition, the direct effects of a substance or another mental
disorder. Essentially, the person
presents with medically unexplained physical signs and/or symptoms and there is
reason to suspect that their complaints are due to psychological factors or
variables and that the individual is not faking or Malingering (V65.2). The most frequently diagnosed Somatoform
Disorders are: a Somatization Disorder,
an Undifferentiated Somatoform Disorder, a Conversion Disorder, Pain Disorders,
and Hypochondriasis. It is important that the doctor diagnosing a
Somatoform Disorder explicitly state what evidence they have, in the form of
medical records and/or the patient’s clinical presentation at their
examination, that indicates that psychological factors or variables are
producing the patients symptoms or complaints. In situations where the doctor has not
provided such information in their report, you should ask the doctor, “Where in
your report did you cited medical records from such professionals as
orthopedists, chiropractors, neurologists and/or physical therapists who stated
that not all of the patient’s complaints of pain are completely understandable
as being the result of underlying physical pathology?”
Wednesday, May 31, 2017
Sleep Disorders - Cross-Examining Psych Doctors, Tip #83
The DSM-IV-TR describes four classes
of sleep disorders and categorizes them by their cause. The four classes are: Primary Sleep Disorders, Sleep Disorders
Related to Another Mental Disorder, Sleep Disorders Due to a General Medical
Condition and Substance-Induced Sleep Disorders. When the doctor diagnoses a disorder under
any of these categories, you should review their report to determine if they
discussed the qualitative nature, frequency, intensity, duration, onset and
course of the patient’s sleeping complaints over time. Unfortunately,
you will likely find that the doctor did not provide any information about what
the patient’s sleeping behaviors were like prior to their claimed injury so
that the reader has absolutely no idea if the sleep disturbance reported by the
doctor represented a change in functioning over time or was simply the
patient’s normal sleep pattern.
Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire a psychological test?- Cross-Examining Psych Doctors, Tip #82
The Activities of Daily Living
Questionnaire (ADL Questionnaire) is frequently cited in psychological testing
sections of psychological reports.
However, the ADL Questionnaire is not a psychological test in the sense
that it is administered to a patient.
This measure is simply a list of six functions, “bathing, dressing,
toileting, moving, continence and feeding.”
Instead of presenting the patient with any material to respond to, as is
done with a psychological test, the doctor examining the patient simply rates
the patient either “Yes” or “No” according to what the doctor believes is true
about the six functions. Clearly, the
ADL Questionnaire does not obtain any objective measures of the patient but is
simply an alternate way of the doctor subjectively stating their opinion about
the patient. Accordingly, in a
medical-legal context, the ADL Questionnaire has no known objective relationship
to the existence of any DSM psychological disorders.
Hamilton Anxiety Scale - Cross-Examining Psych Doctors, Tip #81
The Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAS) is
frequently cited in psychological testing sections of psychological
reports. However, the HAS is not a
psychological test since it does not administer any physical material to the
person being “tested” (Hamilton, 1959).
The HAS is simply a list of what was accepted in 1959 as fourteen
frequently accepted symptoms or complaints of anxiety. Instead of presenting the patient with any
material to respond to, as is done with a psychological test, the doctor
examining the patient simply rates the patient on a five-point scale according
to how extensively the doctor believes the patient is experiencing each of the
thirteen symptoms. As such, the HAS does
not obtain any objective measures of the patient but is simply an alternate way
of the doctor subjectively stating their opinion that the patient has
anxiety. In a medical-legal context, the
Hamilton Anxiety Scale has no known objective relationship to the existence of
any DSM psychological disorders.
Friday, May 5, 2017
Use of the Pain Patient Profile (P3) - Cross-Examining Psych Doctors, Tip #80
The
Pain Patient Profile is a self-rating instrument that purports to provide
measures of an individual on their credibility as well as any possible
depression and anxiety in addition to the level of physical symptoms that are
produced by psychological factors or variables.
A reading of the psychological literature fails to demonstrate that this
instrument has any validity or reliability with regard to assessing
psychopathology or providing any information about a patient’s test-taking
attitudes or credibility. Thus, any
conclusions drawn from a patient’s performance on this “test” is entirely
arbitrary and unsupportable and the use of this instrument in a medical-legal
context is a substantial flaw in the psych doctor’s report.
Recent, Remote, and Long-term memory Tasks - Cross-Examining Psych Doctors, Tip #79
During the course of a Mental Status
Examination, it is standard procedure to measure an individual’s memory. These processes are easily measured with a
variety of objective techniques that yield easily reported upon observational
data. For example, to measure long-term
or remote memory the doctor typically asks the patient to recall such
verifiable personal information as their Social Security number and/or their
California driver's license number. When
the doctor has not described their observations of the patient’s long-term or
remote memories when taking the doctor’s testimony during a trial or deposition
you should ask the doctor; “Doctor, will you please tell me where in your
report of your Mental Status Examination you provided your measurements of the
patient’s performance on relatively standard examining techniques in the areas
of remote, and long-term memory?”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)